Kuttner … ch. 3 Labor Markets and Inequality                                                                          

 

Extreme Views

Inequality is laissez-faire Justice ßà Current inequality outweighs allocative efficiency

                                                           

Facts:

·        Between 1947 to 1973 economy grew faster and income more equally distributed.

·        Between 1979 to 1993 top 20 percent gained 138 percent in real income, while bottom 60 percent lost real income.

·        CEOs earned 35 times as much as blue collar workers in 1974, by 1990 it was 120 times and now closer to 200 times. Not related to increases in profitability of firms.

 

Response by Economists:

 

·        A result of slow growth in 1970s disproportionately affecting low-skilled workers.

·        Temporary bulge in labor market due to baby-boomers and women entering labor market.

·        Some effect due to international trade (and competition with lower-wage foreign workers) but in long-term this just matter of comparative advantage – i.e., good for allocative efficiency. (see remarks by Greg Mankiw et al in administration).

 

Response by government:

 

·        Talk of retraining and paying losers some transitional benefits.

·        Reality was that benefits to unemployed and poor were cut in Reagan years and taxes on payroll were increased while corp. profits taxes and the wealthy were cut.

 

Inequality continued even during boom of 1990s

 

·        Kuttner argues it’s due to increased marketization – incomes, benefits and job security are not protected by unions and government.

                                                                                                                  2

·        Why? Some argue it’s due to merit being the true determinant of income – it’s what you deserve. A true meritocracy. So, it you’re not rich, you’re inferior.

·        But globalization has allowed wages of workers around the world to converge downward.

·        Third world workers are making products they can’t afford to buy. Keynes’ solution to Say’s law flaw is not available on a world scale. So, advanced countries’ workers will find that capital-labor accord is broken – they will not share in productivity increases of their firms.

·        Credit contraction in exchange for neo-liberal opening of domestic countries’ markets slows the growth of economies. (End of Bretton Woods system).  Now bankers’ bias is to slow growth rather than risk inflation devaluing investments.

·        Higher unemployment exacerbates inequality (similar to Marx’s reserve army of unemployed).

 

Facts:

·        Federal reserve raised interest rates seven times in 1990s to slow growth and job creation.

·        Despite belief among U.S. policy-makers in the Natural Rate of Unemployment, Swedish government able to keep unemployment low and not incur inflation through social cooperation between capital and labor.

·        Social bargaining in U.S. doesn’t exist.

·        Shift away from Manuf. Jobs to service jobs also accounts for greater inequality since jobs vary from baby-sitting to software engineers and “symbolic analysts”.

·        Besides reduced social safety net (min. wage etc), deregulation of business has increased price competition among giant firms increasing downward pressure on wages.

·        Labor bashing has worked: from Wagner Act (1932) to Taft-Hartley (1947) and Reagan’s open warfare against labor (PATCO) reduced labor from 35 percent of labor force in late 1940s to 11 percent by 1995.

                                                                                                         3

Supposed New Realities:

 

·        Knowledge Age benefits everyone except those less-skilled 20 percent who won’t make the transition.

·        But 80 percent of Americans (many with college degrees) haven’t benefited – their real incomes have declined.

·        Solutions:

                   Democrats à increased funds for education & retraining

                 Republicansà trust the private sector (Hamburger U.)

·        Kuttner says skills gap a mirage. Workers becoming more literate. Not lack of skills but lack of good jobs.

 

Facts:

·        “Since 1989 productivity has increased by 1.5 percent per year yet median wage has steadily declined.”

·        “In 1980s as educational levels increased, economists calculated that upwards of 20 percent of college graduates were performing jobs that did not require a college degree.”

Answers:

·        Social Labor Market: Policy changes à full employment, stronger unions, fair trade, wage subsidy and social income, education and training, gain-sharing commitments, responsible corporations.

 

 

High Roads, Low Roads and Power 

Claims that it’s still possible to have a humane workplace: Many firms still consider employees as long-term assets. 

 Examples: Harmon International avoids layoffs by bringing outsourced work back into plants. Powersoft has in-house team of contingent employees. Magma Copper negotiated 15-year contract with United Steel Workers productivity-gains profit sharing.

 But these are exception: “globalization and IT have eroded power of labor and the state.”

 

·        Free market ideologists ignore power à discrimination must be rational otherwise it wouldn’t be undertaken. “groups do not exist, only individuals.” – allows them to ignore potential gains to some by excluding whole groups (minorities, women) from labor pool and wage and working condition benefits.

·        Marginal Disutility of Labor: work is onerous, wages compensate for pain. Workers therefore prone to shirk and need to be monitored.

·        Marxian view: Class issue à employers treat workers badly, therefore workers encouraged to shirk.