TWA flight 800 exploded in
the air over the Atlantic off the coast of Long
Island at 13,800 feet on
climb out from New York for Paris on July 17, 1997
**
The
paragraph below was written as shown on Nov. 26, 1997.
Since then, many more attacks
occurred against America and Israel.
See below "Stop - Notice" for
latest change.
**
This page started originally 0n Nov. 26, 1997. Text below based
on that date. As I write this, line it is Dec. 3, 2005.
***
It is a year and a half since the tragedy on the night of July 17,
1996 and no evidence of a cause has been found. But on the evidence of
no evidence, the FBI through New York Agent James Kallstrom at newyork@fbi.gov
has just issued its report in November 1997 that there was no "terrorist"
cause.
Then immediately following, the CIA released a - "cartoon" - an animation which they say - again without evidence - that it had to have been an electrical/mechanical failure. And they deny the testimony of over 100 credible witnesses who saw a wobbly streak of light rise from the surface and ascend for an appreciable time toward the sky. They then observed it take a turn and perhaps another followed immediately by a bright flash of light from an explosion followed by a fireball falling from the sky. The CIA should be thanked for the nice kiddie porn cartoon because it is so obscene in its lies that it makes real kiddie porn of the flesh seem like nothing - nil - nada!
The Cia had an animation and also still pictures. They claimed all the witnesses were mistaken and that they never did see a long flight of a rocket from the surface. They said there was an explosion showing a small flash at which time the nose fell off and descended. They said the plane relieved of the weight of the nose went into a climb trailing burning fuel and then there was a huge explosion where the plane came apart.
The fallacy of this is that while the plane would go into a curving climb, the climb would be very short due to the air resistance on the blunt open front and the steep climb so that the climb might have been 200 feet or thereabouts. And not a prolonged climb from the surface. And why would the FBI and the CIA be so disingenuous? Well, kiddies, The U.S. Government does not want to admit the possibility of terrorism and have to explain why. And there is always a reason for terrorism even in the mind of a nut as well as in the mind of a "terrorist" seeking revenge or to induce political change by sending a "strong message" as after the New York World Trade Center bombing
Yes. The explosion would have torn a huge hole in the bottom leaving insufficient fuselage structure to retain the nose section It therefore fell while the burning plane climbed only a short distance in an arc before stalling and falling into the ocean. That is the most likely thing that happened with all the evidence available - except perhaps - some incriminating evidence hidden or destroyed by the FBI - as has been alleged. Honestly, I hate to be a rumor monger but what the FBI and CIA is completely impossible and implausible while what I write here is at least possible and most likely.
So this below is for the official record!
***
Stop - Notice!
Revision: Since this page was
started, much has happened which may change some of what I have presented.
Some is fact and some is theory based on "best information" and some is
speculation based on rational possibilities, hence requires further
investigation.
But one thing remains constant.
The event did happen and there was a cause or reason.
Essentially there were three
assumptions - or theories:
1.
Due to fire trails, some thought the USN firing missiles in a nearby training
exercise had one go astray and hit TWA-800.
2.
Most, immediately and still do, believe a missile - perhaps two -
fired from the surface hit the plane based upon over 100 civilian observers'
reports to the FBI.
3.
Few non government "outsiders" thought it was an on board malfunction.
But the NTSB, FAA, FBI, Boeing and others, seemingly
under political pressure from Washington, concluded
the cause was a spark or hot spot in the tank's internal fuel pump or wiring.
They
came up with this assumption without an iota of proof after getting together
in what were obviously sessions to protect themselves from any blame.
In other words, instead of using best information from many overlapping
observations, they began an obvious blackout
and denial of a human being directly involved
in the ignition by a bomb or missile.
***
Those believing the official
Government report are welcome to it. But those who fly the plane and service
it, along with many other engineers who would know, say that specific theory
based on no evidence was impossible or virtually impossible in the light
of better evidence which was totally rejected.
***
In view of this and due to more
recent evidence, it seems most likely that a time bomb or similar was planted
under a seat above the fuel tank and when it exploded, it blew a hole in
the floor and into the tank. Meantime, a picture is worth a thousand words.
The explosion occurred, blowing off the front section which fell to the
ocean. The rear section, relieved of the front weight, climbed, spilling
bodies, baggage and spilling blazing fuel which could be construed as a
rocket trail until the plane stalled and exploded with bodies, baggage
and parts falling to the ocean.
***
Until further proof, I will
leave my sketch untouched. But by ignoring the "rocket path" seen below
the plane's flight path by over 100 average people, we cannot exclude a
rocket until and if positive proof otherwise is presented. Only then will
we have a close approximation of what happened to ignite the center fuel
tank.
JWW June 5, 2004
The next day the lawyers started scrambling to sue for big bucks. The media reported that TWA would not be sued at this time because international law permitted only some $75,000 indemnity per passenger. So they would sue Boeing which made the aircraft for millions per passenger. They would - on mere supposition and without a shred of evidence - hope to win billions in insurance money awards for their clients!
So without evidence could it have been an Act of God? Click to see!
So folks - are we going to permit
a coverup? What to do? Well, first try
your congress persons. Write
to newspapers. Write to Boeing
asking them to fight. Write
to TWA to protest because they
may be next after Boeing. And
write a letter now to
President Bush, The White House,
Washington, DC 20500
I'm not telling you what to think,
say or do, but putting all
things together, the U.S. and
Americans are vulnerable to
unremitting retaliatory terrorism
for their government
supporting and engaging in mass
killings and
expropriations in the Mid East
and the messages being
received state: "U.S. stop supporting
Israel (its illegal
occupation, settlements and
murder of those defending
their lives, homes and lands
from confiscation) and stay
out of Arab (Muslim)
nation's affairs - or we can get you
anytime - anywhere!" This quote
is from the letter which
the bombers of Pan Am 103 sent
to the New York Times.
The nature of terrorism is such
that an act does not have to
be done. Just the credible belief
there is a cause for the act
and the ability to accomplish
the deed will create fear,
sometimes sufficient fear to
cause a change in behavior. And
fear of the unknown is a powerful
weapon - moreso than
guns and bombs.